Alice In Wonderland 3D

Page 1 of 1

You cannot start a new topic
You cannot reply to this topic

Alice In Wonderland 3D

#1 Cori

cori.elle

Group: BLADES
Posts: 9,239
Joined: 26-February 08

Posted 05 March 2010 - 07:23 PM

im hoping i'll get to catch it tomorrow nite after Avatar (dont judge me lol .. everytime i went to the theatre the shit was sold out - yes, still)

anyone else excited or amped for this?

#2 thingsithinkithink

Blade

Group: BLADES
Posts: 1,949
Joined: 31-July 08

Posted 06 March 2010 - 04:59 AM

I just need some magic mushrooms and it's ON!

#3 OutKastedLBClansman

reknihT sdarwkcaB

Group: BLADES
Posts: 5,278
Joined: 06-August 04

Posted 08 March 2010 - 10:06 AM

The movie was visually really dope. The Cheshire Cat was funny too, as I predicted he was my favorite part of the movie.

#4 sylvy

Group: BLADES
Posts: 13,138
Joined: 05-May 06

Posted 08 March 2010 - 10:47 AM

I really loved it.

it really didn't need to be in 3D either. it was dope, but it's gonna be just as dope in regular-d or whatever.

I loved that they took the original and kinda twerked it... giving her a REASON for being in Underland… not just wandering around.

Just loved it.

#5 bace135

Blade

Group: BLADES
Posts: 2,011
Joined: 17-July 07

Posted 08 March 2010 - 05:23 PM

This movie was the biggest piece of shit I've seen since that old Joan of Arc movie.

I stongly advise don't see it.

#6 jaymojanglez

Genesis.

Group: BLADES
Posts: 4,845
Joined: 06-January 03

Posted 08 March 2010 - 05:55 PM

QUOTE (bace135 @ Mar 8 2010, 05:23 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>

This movie was the biggest piece of shit I've seen since that old Joan of Arc movie.

I stongly advise don't see it.

expound

#7 CITYTERRORIST

Grasshopper

Group: BLADES
Posts: 229
Joined: 28-November 09

Posted 08 March 2010 - 09:20 PM

QUOTE (bace135 @ Mar 8 2010, 05:23 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>

This movie was the biggest piece of shit I've seen since that old Joan of Arc movie.

I stongly advise don't see it.

hahah ...yeah man I took my kids and ended up paying $40.00...and that was only for me & my 2 kids!!! FUCK!....but it was OK! The visuals were crazy tho.

#8 marcchrome

Klytus The God

Group: BLADES
Posts: 10,725
Joined: 29-July 04

Posted 09 March 2010 - 03:07 AM

QUOTE (thingsithinkithink @ Mar 6 2010, 04:59 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>

I just need some magic mushrooms and it's ON!

fair warning.. do not waste your money or shrooms for that matter on this wackness... the movie might have been good for the kiddies but far from the dark aesthetic that Tim Burton is known for. i suspect that Disney limited him when it came to creative control on this project.... walked away very dissapointed after this sham was over.

#9 sylvy

Group: BLADES
Posts: 13,138
Joined: 05-May 06

Posted 09 March 2010 - 10:23 AM

I don't know what everyone was excpecting. it was a DISNEY movie.

#10 LEX718

Queens Connect

Group: BLADES
Posts: 12,142
Joined: 25-January 05

Posted 09 March 2010 - 10:30 AM

QUOTE (sylvy @ Mar 9 2010, 10:23 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>

I don't know what everyone was excpecting. it was a DISNEY movie.

Word. I actually want to be able to take my kids to it.

#11 thingsithinkithink

Blade

Group: BLADES
Posts: 1,949
Joined: 31-July 08

Posted 09 March 2010 - 08:07 PM

QUOTE (LEX718 @ Mar 9 2010, 10:30 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>

Word. I actually want to be able to take my kids to it.

I wanted it super dark..... I wish they went rated R...

Oh well.

#12 marcchrome

Klytus The God

Group: BLADES
Posts: 10,725
Joined: 29-July 04

Posted 09 March 2010 - 08:41 PM

QUOTE (sylvy @ Mar 9 2010, 11:23 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>

I don't know what everyone was excpecting. it was a DISNEY movie.

and that is the point you are missing lil sis it was not supposed to be a "Disney" movie this time around... if you know Tim Burton's work then you will know what i speak off... and even for a "Disney" movie sorry...... the shit was still real lame...

#13 LEX718

Queens Connect

Group: BLADES
Posts: 12,142
Joined: 25-January 05

Posted 10 March 2010 - 11:08 AM

At the end of the day, Alice in Wonderland was always just a really weird kids movie.

#14 sylvy

Group: BLADES
Posts: 13,138
Joined: 05-May 06

Posted 10 March 2010 - 11:20 AM

QUOTE (marcchrome @ Mar 9 2010, 08:41 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>

it was not supposed to be a "Disney" movie this time around...

lol. did disney not get that memo?

#15 sylvy

Group: BLADES
Posts: 13,138
Joined: 05-May 06

Posted 10 March 2010 - 11:24 AM

I understand wanting dark and twisted and all that typical Tim Burton stuff... but I don't understand knowing that it's Disney and rated PG and still expecting it.

#16 Cori

cori.elle

Group: BLADES
Posts: 9,239
Joined: 26-February 08

Posted 11 March 2010 - 06:47 PM

QUOTE (sylvy @ Mar 10 2010, 11:24 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>

I understand wanting dark and twisted and all that typical Tim Burton stuff... but I don't understand knowing that it's Disney and rated PG and still expecting it.

basically.

i cant wait to see this. i havent commented yet cuz one show was sold out and i missed the other. fml.

#17 bace135

Blade

Group: BLADES
Posts: 2,011
Joined: 17-July 07

Posted 15 March 2010 - 02:25 AM

Hmm, I didn't expect super dark. I expected good acting, good animation/cgi, good scenery, good story, and music that fit the scenes. I got none of it. This movie was trying waaaaaaayyyy too hard and wasn't able to pull it off. This movie sucked donkey ass in my opinion. But I know some people who aren't super critical and actually enjoyed it.

#18 MagnificentJran

jerk

Group: BLADES
Posts: 8,540
Joined: 18-October 02

Posted 16 March 2010 - 02:16 AM

It's a Tim Burton movie. He's done a lot of movies but not a lot of R Rated movies.

I didn't think it was the greatest flick ever but I enjoyed it. I think I would have rather seen it without the 3D. Other than the Cheshire Cat I don't think 3d added much to it. Once again, Johnny Depp killed it. Crispin Glover was good too.

#19 marcchrome

Klytus The God

Group: BLADES
Posts: 10,725
Joined: 29-July 04

Posted 18 March 2010 - 09:00 AM

QUOTE (sylvy @ Mar 10 2010, 11:24 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>

I understand wanting dark and twisted and all that typical Tim Burton stuff... but I don't understand knowing that it's Disney and rated PG and still expecting it.

wanting no for the sole fact that it was expected yes.... a person would think with all the subliminal shit and innuendos that disney has slid into their movies throughout the decades they would let Burton slide with his creative control..... if you really knew disney's catalog the way you claim to then you would have known this....

http://www.google.com/#hl=en&q=walt+di...0392b745bc1178e

i rest my case......

#20 Amen

Blade

Group: BLADES
Posts: 2,164
Joined: 28-February 03

Posted 18 March 2010 - 12:22 PM

QUOTE (sylvy @ Mar 10 2010, 05:24 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>

I understand wanting dark and twisted and all that typical Tim Burton stuff... but I don't understand knowing that it's Disney and rated PG and still expecting it.

I just think that people are going a little overboard with blaming Disney for neutering the film...

Lest we forget that Nightmare Before Christmas was a Disney film, and certainly contained the dark/twisted elements Burton is known for.

So I can completely understand people's frustration when they dont get the Burton-esque darkness with Alice and Wonderland.. the fact that it is a Disney film has nothing to do with this movie's failure to meet those expectations, as Disney's resume' with Burton is dark and twisted.

More believable to me, would be that Burton simply missed the mark on capturing the darker side of the Alice story..

A